firewall/ipt-gateway
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Change rule for masquerading, but i don't know, if the new one is correct.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Christoph 2018-03-19 01:17:11 +01:00
parent aa6a6aa992
commit 6765ae9020
2 changed files with 8 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
conf/main_ipv4.conf.sample
View File

@ -1041,6 +1041,8 @@ masquerade_tcp_cons=""
# - portforward_tcp="$ext_if_dsl_1:9997:192.168.52.25:22
# - $ext_if_dsl_1:9998:192.168.53.24:22"
# -
# - Blank separated list
# -
portforward_tcp=""
@ -1054,6 +1056,8 @@ portforward_tcp=""
# - portforward_udp="$ext_if_dsl_1:1094:192.168.52.25:1094
# - $ext_if_dsl_1:9999:192.168.53.24:1095"
# -
# - Blank separated list
# -
portforward_udp=""

5
ipt-firewall-gateway
View File

@ -258,7 +258,10 @@ if [[ ${#nat_network_arr[@]} -gt 0 ]] && $kernel_activate_forwarding ; then
continue
fi
$ipt -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${_val_arr[1]} -d ${_val_arr[0]} -j MASQUERADE
# - ?? - Don't know which rule is the right one
# -
#$ipt -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${_val_arr[1]} -d ${_val_arr[0]} -j MASQUERADE
$ipt -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${_val_arr[1]} -s ${_val_arr[0]} -j MASQUERADE
done
fi